There's also some comparison of features that aren't close-enough counterparts to be compared. If you could state your satisfactions and dissatisfactions with ID it would be helpful to you, as well as to anyone who might have a suggestion or recommendation.Īnd found marketing-speak that clouds some of the information. I don't think you've stated why you're considering other solutions than the InDesign one you're already using. This is very helpful as I am in the dark about many of the aspects of what we are trying to achieve! :) this is where I think, based on your descriptions, FM may make the day.Īgain, thank you all very much for the input. We have a number of other technical books that we write when we do technical assessments for our clients, or updated audit trails that would be nice to convert to a Web based system accessible to the client only. It will be published to PDF as well as SharePoint sites, and if possible, SharePoint based Wiki (still under investigation). The manual is quite complex with sections and subsectionis that contain images, screen shots, tables, and the like. Each chapter being dedicated to each Web enabled element therein. I will look into it further.Īnd, you are right: we need to be clear on what we need to be doing with the documentation and how we are going about it.Īn example is a multiple chapter manual on the usage of the Remote Web Workplace in Small Business Server/Essential Business Server. I did have a look for some comparisons on Adobe's site and I must have missed them. If you are looking for a product that can interact with the outside world (database in/out, xml, websites, webhelp etc. Even the Adobe herd of evangelists are now doing a very good effort to clearly tell that ID and FM are two extremely different products for different purposes. A few years ago thre was no real explanation as to the differences between FM and ID. The remark made in thhis thread to look into the Adone website is very important. If you write documentation with "just" text, ANY product can be used. I once did a Technical Documentation in WordPad!!!! So when you write Technical documentation, a more in-depth description is needed (I think) for an objective answer to your question. The more structure, the more interactivity, the more inter document references you need the more FM is a preferred product. It all lies in the nature of your documentation which product you should choose. So a comparison of ID and FM on that account is in my mind not relevant (I even have two PDF's one from ID and one from FM. Content, structure is by far the more important issues. In techincal documentation typography should be the least of your worries.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |